New York City Guns archive
Category : Politics

President Obama Bans Importation of Kalashnikov & Izhmash Firearms (No More Saiga?!)

Categories: Activism, News, Politics
Tags: No Tags
Comments: No Comments
Published on: July 18, 2014


This week, the Treasury Department used authority delegated to it by the president, under Executive Order 13661, to sanction Russian gun maker Kalashnikov Concern (formerly Izhmash). In the United States, the manufacturer is best known for its popular Saiga rifles and shotguns. While ostensibly a measure to curb aggression by some in the Russian Federation, the move does bar from importation firearms that gun control supporters have long sought to ban. We of course recognize the important role that enacting sanctions can have in furthering legitimate U.S. foreign policy interests. However, in this instance the extent to which these actions coincide with the stated domestic policy goals of gun control supporters is more than a little unsettling. As such, NRA-ILA is monitoring this situation closely.

Executive Order 13661, titled, “Blocking Property of Additional Persons Contributing to the Situation in Ukraine,” was signed March 16th in response to Russian actions in the ongoing conflict in Ukraine. The order gives the Secretary of the Treasury the power to compile an appropriate list of entities to be sanctioned. On July 16th, the Treasury Department announced that it was expanding this list to include Kalashnikov Concern.

The old adage goes: The only decent product ever produced by the USSR was the AK-47. After the breakup of the USSR and the end of Cold War, Russia has continued to produce well-regarded AK-pattern rifles that have become popular among American gun owners. The intense U.S. demand for Saiga’s in recent years led to a 2012 New York Times article profiling the popular imports.

While the United States government blames the Ukrainian conflict for this latest move, gun control advocates will no doubt applaud the ban on importation of some of the very types of firearms at the center of recent domestic attempts to ban so-called “assault weapons.”

Kalashnikov -OGI

For current owners of Kalashnikov firearms, the Treasury Department has stated that firearms already owned by Americans or in the secondary market are not affected by the sanctions. In a FAQs that accompanied the July 16th announcement, the Treasury Department made clear:

If a U.S. person is in possession of a Kalashnikov Concern product that was bought and fully paid for prior to the date of designation (i.e., no payment remains due to Kalashnikov Concern), then that product is not blocked and OFAC sanctions would not prohibit the U.S. person from keeping or selling the product in the secondary market, so long as Kalashnikov Concern has no interest in the transaction.

Whatever the true basis of the current decision might be, import restrictions have long been used by the executive branch as a means of unilaterally enacting gun control. Historically, this has often occurred through abuses of the “sporting purposes” test. For example, this standard is used in requiring the Attorney General to authorize import of any firearm that “is generally recognized as particularly suitable for or readily adaptable to sporting purposes.” The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (BATFE), however, has ignored the popularity of particular shooting sports to justify its attempts prohibit certain firearms. Further, the entire test is constitutionally suspect, particularly in light of the U.S. Supreme Court’s Heller decision which recognizes self-defense as core to the Second Amendment right.

This tactic was used in 1989 by George H. W. Bush, and in 1998 by Bill Clinton, to ban the import of several types of semi-automatic rifles. As recently as March, Sen. Dianne Feinstein sent a letter to Obama urging that he use the “sporting purposes” test to bar certain firearms from importation. In a similar example of executive branch gun control through import restrictions, in 1996, Clinton entered the U.S. into a “Voluntary Restraint Agreement” with Russia that banned the importation of several types of firearms.

More recently, importation of a popular brand of Russian ammunition that had long been available in the U.S. was abruptly banned under a federal regulation pertaining to so-called “armor piercing” handgun ammunition. BATFE has thus far failed to explain why this ammunition, favored by many recreational rifle shooters for its relative affordability, did not qualify for the “sporting purposes” exemption that has been applied to other military surplus cartridges designed for use in rifles. This has led to renewed calls for BATFE to explain its methodology for making “sporting purposes” determinations.

Taking into consideration these past import-based firearms restrictions, and the administration’s ongoing attempts to further gun control through executive actions, gun owners are rightfully skeptical. These latest sanctions will no doubt engender the idea among some that the Treasury Department is using a geopolitical crisis as a convenient excuse to advance the president’s domestic anti-gun agenda.

We will continue to look for opportunities to block the Obama administration’s anti-gun agenda whether through the legal, legislative or political arenas.

Chinese Hackers Steal Personal Information of US Security-Clearance Holders From US Gov’t Servers

Categories: Be Prepared, News, Politics
Tags: No Tags
Comments: No Comments
Published on: July 18, 2014

Chinese hackers in March broke into the computer networks of the United States government agency that houses the personal information of all federal employees, according to senior American officials. They appeared to be targeting the files on tens of thousands of employees who have applied for top-secret security clearances.

The hackers gained access to some of the databases of the Office of Personnel Management before the federal authorities detected the threat and blocked them from the network, according to the officials. It is not yet clear how far the hackers penetrated the agency’s systems, in which applicants for security clearances list their foreign contacts, previous jobs and personal information like past drug use.

In response to questions about the matter, a senior Department of Homeland Security official confirmed that the attack had occurred but said that “at this time,” neither the personnel agency nor Homeland Security had “identified any loss of personally identifiable information.” The official said an emergency response team was assigned “to assess and mitigate any risks identified.”

One senior American official said that the attack was traced to China, though it was not clear if the hackers were part of the government. Its disclosure comes as a delegation of senior American officials, led by Secretary of State John Kerry, are in Beijing for the annual Strategic and Economic Dialogue, the leading forum for discussion between the United States and China on their commercial relationships and their wary efforts to work together on economic and defense issues.

Read More…

ZoNATION Video: The Real Black NRA! (Libs Hate Blacks & Gun Owners)

Categories: Activism, Humor, News, Politics, Videos
Tags: No Tags
Comments: 3 Comments
Published on: July 17, 2014

Sarah Silverman’s Funny or Die video should probably die, but not by shooting.

Zo and some buddies ask the hard questions of the Hollywood libs in the satirical video about founding a ‘Black NRA.” It’s definitely not funny, but find out why it’s also racist and unintelligent.

Experience the creative energy and conservative insight that Zo delivers in every show with the ZoNation Complete Series Collection. Just click here:

Jersey City *police* face gang threats after cop killer shooting (Smash the Gang Members!)

Tags: No Tags
Comments: 1 Comment
Published on: July 17, 2014

There are serious threats against police officers in northern New Jersey from gang members who want to retaliate for a deadly shooting at an all-night Walgreens drugstore Sunday morning, CBS New York station WCBS-TV reports.

Sources told WCBS-TV that Jersey City police have stepped up patrols following two police-involved shootings this week.

A man shot and killed police officer Melvin Santiago Sunday. The police said the suspect, Lawrence Campbell, 27, was then shot and killed by officers.

Campbell ambushed Santiago, 23, when he and his partner responded to a call at the Walgreens at around 4 a.m. Sunday, police said. Campbell shot Santiago with a gun he had snatched from a security guard he assaulted, police said.

Due to the threats, all officers must patrol in pairs and the department has stepped up security for Santiago’s wake and funeral, which is scheduled for Friday at St. Aloysius Catholic Church.

Read More…

Border Agents Threaten to Side With Patriot Protesters if Obama Orders them to Use Force!

Tags: No Tags
Comments: No Comments
Published on: July 16, 2014

illegal alien 9

We’ve been saying for two weeks that President Obama has a weak hand as he promotes his plan to deal with his own manufactured “border crisis”. Quite simply the entire administration is on the wrong side of the people.

This recent report from the Border Patrol not only confirms this perspective, but further outlines how stark and contrasting is the opposition to illegal immigration.

CALIFORNIA - In an exclusive expose regarding the immigration standoff in Murrieta, California, it was revealed by a confidential informant inside the Murrieta U.S. Border Patrol facility that the real reason busses stopped delivering illegal immigrants was due to a virtual mutiny within the U.S. Border Patrol ranks.

Guerilla Media Network investigative journalists conducted a recorded telephone interview with a highly credible and prominent Murrieta community leader on Sunday July 14, 2014 when it was revealed that frontline U.S. Border Patrol agents threatened to stand down if the Department of Homeland Security executed a plan to use force upon protesters if they impeded buses transporting undocumented immigrants into the Murrieta processing facility.

Read More…

How The Ruinous “Living Constitution” Idea Took Root

Categories: Activism, Education, Politics
Tags: No Tags
Comments: No Comments
Published on: July 16, 2014

The “living Constitution” theory amounts to saying that Supreme Court justices should be allowed to rewrite the foundation of our government as they see fit, sometimes adding ideas that weren’t included, sometimes ignoring ideas that were.

Mostly, “living Constitution” decisions entail the latter, turning a blind eye to the document’s clear limits on governmental power.

From their experience with the British crown, the Founders had a deep fear of government and sought to keep its authority strictly limited. But their philosophy on the proper scope of government conflicts with the views of Americans who believe that ever-expanding state power is the key to a good society. For them, the real Constitution is an obstacle to their goals — hence the need for a pretty euphemism – “living Constitution” to cover up their undermining of the rule of law.

Where did this ruinous idea come from? When and how did it arise? My supposition had always been that it was a creation of the “progressives” in our legal system early in the last century, exemplified by Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes, and liberal intellectuals who favored FDR’s vast expansion of federal authority.

That view is not exactly right, argues John Compton, Assistant Professor of Political Science at Chapman University, in his new book The Evangelical Origins of the Living Constitution. Compton contends that the “living Constitution” idea arose much earlier in our history, an outgrowth the moral reform movement that swept across the United States from the 1820s until the early decades of the 20th century.

Zealous champions of moral reform, then as today, thought that a proper function of the law was to eradicate vice and immorality. They were stymied, however, by the Constitution’s limits on governmental power. Compton explains, “For while the designers of the American constitutional order did not set out with the aim of inhibiting the moral development of future generations, they did envision a republic whose fundamental law would hinder efforts to interfere with settled property rights or restrict the flow of goods in interstate markets.” But that was exactly what the anti-liquor and anti-lottery forces wanted – for the law to declare that there could be no legitimate property rights in alcoholic beverages or lottery tickets and to block their flow in markets altogether.

Read More…

The Stupidest Article About Guns You Will Ever Read (Rolling Stone Again)

Categories: Humor, News, Politics
Tags: No Tags
Comments: No Comments
Published on: July 16, 2014

Screengrab via Rolling Stone

Bar none. Go ahead, I dare you to read it and not thump your head against the nearest wall. It starts badly enough:

Contrary to what those who defend the right to own high-powered assault rifles believe, not all guns are created equal. Due to a combination of availability, portability and criminal usage the following five types of guns are the country’s most dangerous.

And then gets worse. The link takes you to the instantly infamous piece in Rolling Stone by some poor lassie named Kristen Gwynne entitled, “The Five Most Dangerous Guns in America.” Now, most normal people reading that might think what follows is a list of suggestions for your next firearms purchase — you know, something that packs major firepower into an attractive, well-priced package that will instantly deter or atomize a bad guy should the need arise. But no. It’s an anti-gun piece. And by “anti-gun,” I don’t mean anti specific makes and models. Oh no…

Read More…

Cops “SWATTED” wrong house, charged homeowner, Jury Acquits Homeowner (FU Police State)

Tags: No Tags
Comments: 1 Comment
Published on: July 16, 2014

The dark figures in Watson\'s backyard turned out to be police, who were at the wrong house. They charged him with reckless use of a firearm.

Imagine you’re up watching our late night news when you hear your back door rattling, then see a red laser pointed on your chest. One Portsmouth man claims that happened to him.

Brandon Watson said he was protecting his family when his wife heard noises in the back yard on January 3, 2013: “She said, ‘oh my gosh, someone is in the backyard.’” The noises got closer and then she heard the clicking of the backdoor handle.”

In a neighborhood where weapons are everywhere, Brandon Watson didn’t hesitate to grab his own legally purchased gun. It was a decision with lingering repercussions.

Brandon remembers, “We ran upstairs very quickly … she saw guys in all black from right here in this window looking down.” Watson said he couldn’t immediately find his cell phone to call 911 so he ran downstairs with his firearm and stood at the foot of the stairs, shielded by a wall.

“I announced myself, ‘Who is that? Who is that? I have a gun.’ And as soon as I said that, two red laser beams were on my chest,” Watson said. “so I looked at the red laser beams on my chest, and I fired a warning shot.”

A single shot through a window, and then Watson ran to get help from his neighbor across the street, a Virginia State Police deputy.

As I came out of the house … they said, ‘stop,’ and I said, ‘Who?’ They then said, ‘Who just fired the shot out the back window?’ I said I did … and I was holding a gun, and they said, ‘put down the gun.’”

Watson dropped his handgun and said he received shocking news.

“They said, ‘we just got news you shot at an officer.’ I said, ‘An officer? Nobody came to my door. What do you mean an officer? I didn’t know there were any officers in my backyard,’” he told

Then he learned the dark figures in his backyard were Portsmouth police officers who had not announced themselves.

“As far as the officers response, I support their response 100 percent,” said Portsmouth Police Chief Ed Hargis, who claims his men never heard Watson say he had a gun or say anything. “Anytime the police hear there is a firearm, they start giving verbal commands, and they start yelling police.”

It came out in court last September that police were in the wrong backyard. They were supposed to be in Patricia Brooks yard, which is next door to Watson. She had called 911 because she heard unrelated noises in the downstairs of her home.

Portsmouth Commonwealth’s Attorney Earle Mobley explained how police ended up in the wrong backyard: “When they went around from the front, they started counting 2, 3, 4.” They were counting the number of townhouse units from the end, where Patricia Brooks lived. “Then they see a gate that is open, and that raises suspicion that must be the house,” Mobley said.

Mobley admits Watson did not know police were in his backyard, but prosecutes him anyway for misdemeanor reckless handling of a fire arm.

“You cannot fire indiscriminately through the window,” Mobley said.

And a judge agreed. Watson was found guilty. So he appealed the decision, and a second judge declared a mistrial. At that point, Watson chose to have a jury trial.

“This can’t be doing your job. You come in my backyard, try to open my door, open my window and flash red laser beams on my chest because you thought I was the burglar, and I thought you were the burglar,” Watson said.

The seven-person jury bought that, and found Brandon Watson not guilty, after deliberating only 47 minutes.

“The Commonwealth really didn’t have a case. It wasn’t reckless, so it didn’t’ take a lot of discussion,” said Danny Barnes, a juror and WAVY-TV 10 employee.

Read More…


NYCG Radio Episode #76 – 7/8/14 “Own the Suck of Obama Libclowns”

Tags: No Tags
Comments: No Comments
Published on: July 16, 2014

New York City Guns Radio Episode

Gun Confiscation Begins in New York, Biden, Bloomturd Describe Second Amendment Supporters with Vulgarities and Slurs, NYC creates ID card so 500K illegal immigrants can get services, New York to offer free lunch to all middle-school students, Fight To Shut Down Decades-Old Gun Range Continues In Westchester, Anti-Gunners Kill More Jobs with Bloomberg-Style Laws: Mossberg Flees CT, NJ Cop killer’s widow rages: He should’ve killed more cops, Honest Gun-Owning Mom Busted In NJ Could Face 3 Years In Prison, Chris Christie’s Faking It on Gun Rights, Just Days After TARGET Starts Its ‘No Gun’ Policy, THIS Happens…, Study: Murder, Violent Crime Fall as Concealed Carry Rises 130 Percent, SEALs say Jesse Ventura hit the ground in bar incident, Brady Campaign Sues to Prevent Kansas from Nullifying Federal Gun Laws, Army to replace 9mm pistol with more reliable gun packing better ‘knock down’ power, CCRKBA FILES LAWSUIT CHALLENGING FEDERAL LAW ON HANDGUN PURCHASES, How to Beat the NRA In 7 (Not-So-Easy) Steps (Rolling Stone Libtard Hit Job on NRA), What Is Gun Violence?, Any State Not Maintaining a True Constitutional Militia is a Law-Breaking State, The ultimate goal of the NSA is total population control, Barack Obama, Fabian Socialist, Forensic profiler: Obama ‘slipping mentally’, America, the bullied.


Testimony: Dead Hero Navy Seal Did Punch Jesse Ventura for His Anti-American Drivel!

Categories: Humor, Legal, News, Politics
Tags: No Tags
Comments: No Comments
Published on: July 15, 2014

Tuesday’s witnesses at Jesse Ventura’s defamation trial stitched together a scene a California bar that ended with the former governor lying on his back.

The latest witness in the case being heard in U.S. District Court in St. Paul, former SEAL Lt. Cmdr. Andrew Paul, said he saw a commotion, then saw Ventura get up from the patio floor and yell that he was going to kill Chris Kyle.

Afterward, Paul said, “Chris told me, ‘Jesse was running his mouth and I punched him.’ ”

Kyle’s account of the alleged incident in his memoir, “American Sniper,” is the subject of Ventura’s defamation suit against Kyle’s estate and widow, Taya Kyle. Kyle was killed in 2013 by a veteran he was mentoring.

Ventura said Kyle fabricated the incident and damaged his reputation.

Paul’s testimony was contained in a video deposition given in 2012. Paul was unable to appear, attorneys said.

Paul said he was among the SEALs attending an Oct. 12, 2006, wake at McP’s bar in Coronado, Calif., for a SEAL killed in Iraq. Ventura was at the bar attending a gathering of underwater demolition unit members.

Paul said he saw Ventura surrounded by people on the patio and he walked up to listen. “He was going on about the war in Iraq, the Bush administration. He was very opinionated.”

Read More…


Categories: Activism, Legal, News, Politics
Tags: No Tags
Comments: 1 Comment
Published on: July 15, 2014

BELLEVUE, WA – The Citizens Committee for the Right to Keep and Bear Arms has filed a lawsuit today in federal court in Texas against Attorney General Eric Holder and B. Todd Jones, director of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, challenging the current federal law prohibiting cross-state handgun purchases.

CCRKBA brings this lawsuit on behalf of its members throughout the country, who would legally buy and sell handguns outside of their home states, just as they currently do with long guns. Joining CCRKBA as plaintiffs in the case are Texas resident Fredric Russell Mance, Jr., and Tracey Ambeau Hanson and Andrew Hanson, both of Washington, D.C. The lawsuit was filed in U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas, Fort Worth division. Financial assistance for the lawsuit is provided by the Second Amendment Foundation.

CCRKBA Chairman Alan Gottlieb, noting that his organization rarely pursues a legal action of such magnitude, said today’s lawsuit is necessary to advance the right to keep and bear arms for all citizens. He said current law essentially criminalizes the interstate handgun market, which does not apply to the sale of rifles or shotguns.

“It is overreaching, if not downright silly, in today’s environment with the federal instant background check system to perpetuate a prohibition on interstate handgun purchases that has outlived its usefulness,” Gottlieb observed. “If a law-abiding citizen can clear a background check and legally purchase a handgun in his own state, he would pass the same background check just across the border in another state.”

This is very important to District of Columbia residents, who can now legally purchase rifles and shotguns from federally-licensed gun dealers in neighboring states, but they still may not purchase handguns. Plaintiff Mance is a federally licensed firearms dealer who would sell handguns directly to consumers in other states, but under current law, he is prohibited from doing so. The Hansons are fully qualified under federal law, and laws in Texas and the District of Columbia, to purchase and possess handguns.

“Federal law allows for interstate long gun sales,” Gottlieb noted, “as long as the dealer follows the law, so what’s the logic of the federal government banning interstate handgun sales? Some states allow for, or even welcome, interstate handgun sales, so what’s the federal government doing?”

What Is Gun Violence? (Why We Need 2A Patriots)

Categories: Activism, Education, News, Politics
Tags: No Tags
Comments: 1 Comment
Published on: July 15, 2014

political cartoon

The term “gun violence” seems to have been coined by either the anti-gun media or some other anti-gun group in an effort to vilify the tool used to perpetrate violence on another.

Somewhere someone said, “If we call it ‘gun violence’ that will make it sound like guns are bad. We should do that.”

You and I know guns are neither good nor bad. Guns cannot do anything on their own. A gun cannot be violent any more than can a hammer, or a bowling pin or a rose bush. A gun can be used during violent acts. But here is something interesting: A violent act is not always a bad thing. Righteous violence in defense of the innocent is a good thing and should be applauded. Yet still the media and anti-gun politicians continue to beat the drum of “gun violence” in America as if to say, “If we take away all the guns, there will be no more violence.”

Several years back, politicians also said, “If we take away all the booze, no one will drink and all those problems will go away.” We saw how that turned out. It spawned the largest crime wave in U.S. history and directly gave rise to criminal syndicates that are still running today.

Since 1993, crime has been dropping. Despite a few recent high-profile cases, the numbers of mass shootings have been dropping. Armed citizens regularly intervene to protect others by employing or threatening to employ violence with a gun. But the media doesn’t report on that. Criminals are much more interesting. Guns work. Violence, when employed against criminal predators, benefits honest citizens.

So I ask again, “What is gun violence?”

Read More…

Any State Not Maintaining a True Constitutional Militia is a Law-Breaking State

Tags: No Tags
Comments: No Comments
Published on: July 15, 2014

I had an interview this week with a reporter from the Sun paper. They dragged up a number of questions, things for which the leftists have previously harangued. One of which is the sermons and teachings I delivered regarding the citizens’ militia.

It is important to understand that they think that anyone who believes what I believe regarding the citizen’s militia is politically speaking dead in the water before the starting gun is even fired. I patiently tried my best to explain to the reporter that the militia, as our Founders structured it, is not some optional, superfluous element of civil government. Rather it is at the heart and core of the Republic of these United States. Indeed, for any State in this Union to fail to maintain and keep a true militia would indicate that State was, and is, in violation of the Supreme Law of the Land, the U.S. Constitution.

In Maryland, it even goes further (as most every State does). The Supreme Law of Maryland requires that there be a citizen’s militia organized and administrated by the State, and specifically in each county under the direct control of the County Sheriff. For any State, including Maryland, to fail to have a true Constitutional Militia is to fail to obey the Supreme Law of the Land, and, therefore, become a law-breaking State.

Read More…

Rolling Stone Mag Advises to Exploit Kids’ Tiny Coffins in order to Beat the NRA (Revolting & Stupid)

Tags: No Tags
Comments: No Comments
Published on: July 15, 2014

Turds on Parade

From the Stupid Rolling Stone article written by Tim Dickinson:

The NRA remains one of the most formidable forces in American political life. But it is not bulletproof. Since the massacres in Aurora and Newtown, states from New York and Maryland to Colorado and California have made modest progress against the gun lobby, passing a raft of new laws aimed at reducing gun violence. There are sharp lessons to be learned from these victories, and even more important ones to be gleaned from the playbook of the NRA itself. The seven strategies below can empower gun-control advocates to stop bemoaning their helplessness, and start carrying the day.

* * *

3. Politicize Disaster, Unabashedly
This may make some progressives queasy. But if you don’t have the stomach for hardball politics, just accept that you’re going to be steamrolled by the NRA — which shamelessly stokes the emotional power of national tragedies like 9/11, Katrina, and Superstorm Sandy to convince Americans that social collapse is around the corner, and you really should be buying that AR-15.

This isn’t complicated: Making a political issue of the tiny coffins of dead children in the wake of a school shooting isn’t just a thing that helps pass strong gun-control, it’s practically the only thing in the last quarter century that’s moved the needle on anti-gun-violence laws. Recall that the catalyst for the 1994 assault weapons ban was a 1989 school shooting in Stockton, California, that killed five kids and wounded 29 other children.

It’s not distasteful to act in the name of victims of gun violence. What’s distasteful to squander the burning anger and intense political focus that such senseless bloodshed inspires. There’s nothing dishonorable in taking the swift and necessary action to prevent other children from being massacred by an idiot with a war rifle.

Read More…

thumbBlack Chicagoans Slam Obama’s Amnesty Program, Call Him Worst President in History (Video)

Categories: Humor, News, Politics, Videos
Tags: No Tags
Comments: No Comments
Published on: July 14, 2014

Black residents of Chicago’s South Side, who recently rallied to decry a spate of violence in the city, ripped President Obama for ignoring their plight while pushing for funding for illegal immigrants at their expense.

The protest against the rash of shootings was staged Friday at the Chicago Police Department headquarters building. Over the Fourth of July weekend, nine people were killed and more than 60 injured, authorities said.

Demonstrators blasted the Obama administration’s inaction in Chicago while federal funds are earmarked to help the roughly 50,000 illegal immigrants who have crossed into America since October.

Read More…

Training Schedule

8/2/14 Utah CCW/FS Pistol Class
Westside Range 12-4 PM $150.00

8/16/14 Utah CCW/FS Pistol Class
Westside Range 12-4 PM $150.00

8/30/14 Utah CCW/FS Pistol Class
Westside Range 12-4 PM $150.00

9/13/14 Utah CCW/FS Pistol Class
Westside Range 12-4 PM $150.00

9/27/14 Utah CCW/FS Pistol Class
Westside Range 12-4 PM $150.00

10/11/14 Utah CCW/FS Pistol Class
Westside Range 12-4 PM $150.00

Awesome Vulgarity Warning!
“2A Victories Abound”


Discount NRA Membership
Join The NRA and Get $10 off a Yearly Membership!
Shop & Support Us
Real Gun Facts
Welcome , today is Monday, July 28, 2014